ANAND RAM vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6801/2024 ANAND RAM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. and Ms. Taha Yasin, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rishab Sahu, Sr. PC with Mr. Gokul Sharma, GP for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 05.03.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The petitioner approached the Central Administrative Tribunal1 by way of OA 3808/2022 with two prayers. The first was for a direction to the respondents to regularise his services from 1995 when his juniors were regularised, with consequential benefits. The second was for grant of the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme. 2. The Tribunal has dismissed the OA on the ground of delay, merely adverting to prayer A which was for grant of regularisation. 3. Ms. Mansi Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits 1 “the Tribunal”, hereinafter 4. Apropos prayer B, on the aspect of limitation, Ms. Gupta places reliance of the judgment of the Supreme Court in UOI v Tarsem Singh2 We note that the Tribunal has extracted the paragraph from Tarsem Singh on which Ms. Gupta places reliance in para 4.4 of the impugned order