ADITYA NARULA vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Judgment text excerpt

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 16/2013 ADITYA NARULA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Sharma and Mr. Anil Lohchub, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, Advocate for DDA Mr. Sunil Goyal, ASC with Mr. Nitin Kala and Mr. Rachit Gupta, Advocates for R-2/SDMC % Date of Decision: 18.03.2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA JUDGMENT DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral) CM APPLs. 22282/2019 (modification of order dated 29.04.2014), 29293/2019 (directions/stay), 35339/2019 (impleadment)& 35340/2019 (recall/modification of order dated 03.07.2019) 1. The application bearing CM APPL. 22282/2019 has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking clarification/modification in Para 8 of the judgment dated 29.04.2014 in RSA No. 16/2013 to the extent that the respondent authority's right to take possession is limited to 5 Bigha 8 Biswa of Khasra No. 31/7, as per the Land Acquiring Authority’s Notification dated 30.10.1986, and does not extend to the remaining CM APPLs. 22282/2019, 29293/2019 & 35339-40/2019 in RSA 16/2013 Page 1 of 11 Signature Not Verified Signed By:DAMINI YADAV Signing Date:19.03.2025 16:17:31 0-4 Biswa. The reliance has been placed upon demarcation report dated 06.03.2018 and compensation records to emphasize that the remaining 0-4 Biswa was never acquired, no compensation was deposited for it. 2. The respondent-DDA, has sought dismissal of the present application on the ground that the applicant/appellant has no right, title or interest in the disputed land and by way of the present application, the appellant is trying to withdraw a prior admission made before the Court after a delay of 6 years. It is submitted that the matter was conclusively settled by the Court vide detailed jud