Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-06-16

WRIT - C No. 5893 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 5893 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 5893 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35592-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5893 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeev Narayan Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Lucknow And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, petitioner-in- person, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri R.G. Nigam, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4. 2. The appeal pending before the State Government appears to have arisen on account of an inaction on the part of the respondents to take a decision on the objections filed by the petitioner against the scheme of acquisition approved by the Board. The petitioner in his appeal has stated that he was put under an impression of undertaking the necessary survey of the site, where his house has been built. The petitioner's objections were filed for exclusion of the site-in-question from the purview of the acquisition notification. 3. Unless an order was passed and communicated to the petitioner, in the normal course he may not h

WRIT - C No. 5893 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam