Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-06-17

WRIT - C No. 5851 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 5851 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 5851 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35672-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5851 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Rakesh Kumar Tripathi learned counsel on behalf of the opposite party no. 6 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Rakesh Kumar Tripathi learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party no. 6. 3. The petitioner has confined his prayer only to the extent of interference by the police authorities regarding the subject matter of this writ petition i.e. shop which is claimed to be in the peaceful possession of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the State on the basis of instructions has stated that the police authorities have no role in the private rights which the petitioner claims vis a vis opposite party nos. 6 to 8 except where it is necessary to maintain the law and order as per the order passed by the competent court. 5.

WRIT - C No. 5851 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam