Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-06-09

VEDPAL SINGH TANWAR vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-4102/2024 2025:DHC:4942
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
VEDPAL SINGH TANWAR
Respondent
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 09.06.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 09.06.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4102/2024 VEDPAL SINGH TANWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sumer Singh Boparai, Mr. Sirhaan Seth, Mr. Surya Pratap Singh and Ms. Sanskriti Shakuntala Gupta, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Standing Counsel for ED (through videoconferencing) CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT GIRISH KATHPALIA, J.: 1. The accused/applicant seeks bail under Section 45/65 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the PML Act”) read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in the Prosecution Complaint no.1929/2024 arising out of ECIR/HIU- 1/08/2023 of PS HIU, Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) for offence under Section 3 and 4 of the PML Act The bail is sought on merits as well as on medical grounds. I heard senior counsel for the accused/applicant and the BAIL APPLN. 4102/2024 pages GIRISH 2. During pendency of this bail application before the predecessor bench, the accused/applicant also filed a miscellaneous application bearing