SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Pronounced on: 30th June, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 4686/2018 SUSHIL KUMAR SAXENA S/o Sh. Ramesh Chandra Saxena R/o HD-06, Sector-135, NOIDA, U.P. - 201304 .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Kumar & Mr. Ansh Arora, Advocates. versus 1. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2. SH. ANIL NARAIN, S/o Sh. Jai Narain R/o 87, Panchsheel Park New Delhi-110017 3. SH. SANJAY GUPTA R/o B-291, Sector-26, NOIDA (U.P.) 4. SH. JAGDEEP GUPTA Partner in M/s Alok & Co. 234, D.D.A. Office Complex Cycle Market, Jhandewalan Extension New Delhi-110055. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for State with SI Sanjeet Rathore. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RITA CRL.M.C. 4686/2018 Page 1 of 13 SHARMA Signing Date:10.07.2025 18:05:30 1. Criminal Petition under Section 482 read with Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the Petitioner (Complainant) for setting aside Order dated 01.05.2018, whereby learned Special Judge (PC Act), CBI has upheld the pre-summoning Order dated 27.11.2017, whereby Respondent Nos.2 to 4 have been summoned only for the offences under Sections 467/471 IPC. 2. The Petitioner/Sushil Kumar Saxena filed a Complaint under S. 156(3) for the summoning of the Respondents for the offences under S. Section 420/468/471/34/120B IPC and under Sections 166A/167 IPC against Respondent No.4, Jagdeep Gupta. The averments therein were that Petitioner/Sushil Kumar Saxena, and Respondent No.2 /Anil Narain were the founder Directors of the Company, i.e. Innowin Professional Pvt. Ltd. Subsequently, Respondent No.3/Sanjay Gupta was inducted as Director in the year 2009, but he resigned on 15.06.2011 and the information was sent to Registrar of Companies (ROC) by fil