SUNIL KUMAR vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 04.06.2025 + W.P.(C) 7870/2025 SUNIL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anup Kr. Das and Mr. Uday Chauhan, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Additional Standing Counsel for MCD/ R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT (Oral) TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. W.P.(C) 7870/2025 and CM APPL. 34765/2025 (for directions) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “(a) Allow the present Writ Petition and Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondent no.1/MCD prohibiting Respondent no.1/MCD to not frequently harass and give threats the Petitioner to displace from his hawking/ squatting site/ Tea stall situated at the back lane of D-7 and D-39 NDSE- II, New Delhi.” 2. After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner would have no objection, in case this Court would pass directions as noted by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Mohammad Naved vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors. bearing W.P.(C) No.12841/2023 rendered on 10.10.2023, particularly, in paragraphs 8 to 10 of the said judgment. The said Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR W.P.(C) 7870/2025 Page 1 of 3 BHATIA Signing Date:05.06.2025 16:59:03 judgment is handed over in Court and is taken on record. 3. Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, learned Standing Counsel for the MCD/Respondent No. 1 submits that in case the Petitioner is restricting his relief to that contained in paragraphs 8 to 10 of the judgment in Mohammad Naved (supra), the Petiti