Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-06-12

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs K.M. SHUKLA & ANR.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-13936/2024 2025:DHC:4958-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Respondent
K.M. SHUKLA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 27.03.2025 Pronounced on: 12.06.2025 + W.P.(C) 13936/2024 & CM APPLs.58534/2024, 60886/2024 STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Nachiketa Joshi, Sr. Adv. (AAGMP) with Mr.Sarad Singhania & Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Advs. versus K.M. SHUKLA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Respondent no.1/Mr.K.M. Shukla in person with Mr.Kumar Dushyant Singh, Mr.Vedansh Anan, Advs. Mr.Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Kushagra Kumar, Mr.Amit Kumar Rana, Advs. for Respondent/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR JUDGMENT NAVIN CHAWLA, J. 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Judgment dated 30.04.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, ‘Tribunal’), in O.A. 1011/2016, titled Vinay Shukla Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 13936/2024 Page 1 of 18 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:12.06.2025 13:50:59 through L.R. K.M. Shukla v. Union of India & Ors., allowing the O.A. with the following directions: “12. In view of the above, the following are ordered: (i) The recovery order dated 18.4.2016 is quashed. (ii) The respondent no. 2 is directed to pay all pending retirement dues like gratuity, outstanding salary arrears, leave encashment along with interest at applicable GPF rates for the period of delay from 3 months after the retirement till date of such payment, to the respondent no. 1. (iii) The Accountant General, Madhya Pradesh and Respondent no.2 are directed to complete the account details in respect of GPF and CGIS immediately and release the accumulated amount to the respondent no. 1 along with interest at applicable GPF rates for the period of delay from 3 months after the r

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs K.M. SHUKLA & ANR. · Niyam