Shailendra Mangal Singh vs Harindra Pal Singh

Judgment text excerpt

OJ-7-CARBPL-16432-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 16432 OF 2025 Shailendra Mangal Singh & Ors …Petitioners Versus Harindra Pal Singh & Ors …Respondents Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, Counsel, a/w Shaheda Madraswala, Jenifer Mogrelia & Sannidhi Agrawal, i/b. Vashi & Vashi, for Petitioners. Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate, a/w Shanay Shah, Saurabhi Agrawal, Darshan Mehta & Aaditya Mapara, i/b. Dhruve Liladhar & Co., for Respondents. CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. DATE: JUNE 18, 2025 ORAL JUDGEMENT: Context and Factual Background: 1. This is an Appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“ the Act”) impugning an order dated May 21, 2025 (“Impugned Order”) passed by a Learned Arbitral Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act. The Appellants, namely, Mr. Shailendra Digitally signed by ASHWINI ASHWINI JANARDAN JANARDAN VALLAKATI Mangal Singh, Nayana Singh and Shaan Singh (collectively, VALLAKATI Date: 2025.07.04 17:04:39 +0530 Page 1 of 25 June 18, 2025 OJ-7-CARBPL-16432-2025.doc “Shailendra”) are aggrieved by the directions passed in the Impugned Order, directing them to execute a conveyance deed to transfer certain specific properties (“Sant Nagar Properties”) in favour of third parties, as directed by the Respondents, namely, Harindra Pal Singh, Sangeeta Singh, Karan Singh and Khushi Singh Chowdhary (collectively “Harindra”). The Learned Arbitral Tribunal has appointed a designated person to execute the conveyance deed to bind Shailendra to the conveyance of the said properties as directed in the Impugned Order. 2. Essentially, the disputes and differences between the parties relate to a family arrangement dated February 2