Delhi High Court · 2025-06-09
RELIANCE EMINENT TRADING AND COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
- Citation / case number
- CS(COMM)-582/2021 2025:DHC:4932
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- RELIANCE EMINENT TRADING AND COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED
- Respondent
- DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Judgment text excerpt
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: 09.06.2025 + CS(COMM) 582/2021 & I.A. 43981/2024 RELIANCE EMINENT TRADING AND COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Mr. Manan Shishodia, Ms. Riya Kumar and Mr. Sumer Sethi, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Defendant Through: Mr.Arvind Varma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sanjay Katyal, Ms. Manika Tripathy, Standing Counsels with Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Smridhi Sharma, Mr. Saurabh Seth, Ms. Muskaan Garg and Ms. Neelam Preet Deol, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J. IA No. 6914/2022 (Under Order XXIII A Rule 4 CPC filed by the plaintiff for a summary judgment) 1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff/applicant seeking money decree in the sum of Rs. 4,59,73,61,098/- along with pendente lite Signature Not Verified CS (COMM) 582/2021 Page 1 of 21 Digitally Signed By:DEEPAK SINGH Signing Date:09.06.2025 21:03:10 and future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit until the date of actual payment. 2. Facts in brief leading to filing of the present suit are that defendant/DDA announced a public auction for various freehold commercial plots including plot no. 13 ad-measuring about 9,556 sq. mtrs. situated at Non-Hierarchical Commercial Complex, Jasola, New Delhi [hereafter referred to as the „plot‟], for which it had fixed the reserve price of Rs.164,86,00,000/-. The plaintiff [then known as Amazon Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.] submitted its bid and deposited 25% of the reserve price i.e. Rs.42,25,00,000/- [Rupees Forty Two Crore and Twenty Five Lacs only]. The bid of Rs.164,91,00,000/- placed by plaintiff was found to be the highest and was