Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-06-23

RASIKLAL MOHANLAL GANGANI vs STATE & ANR

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-6012/2019 2025:DHC:5003
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RASIKLAL MOHANLAL GANGANI
Respondent
STATE & ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 23.06.2025 CRL.M.C. 6012/2019 & CRL.M.A. 41145/2019 RASIKLAL MOHANLAL GANGANI .....Petitioner versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Paul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sriharsh N. Bundela, Ms. Aditi Rai & Mr. Akshit Kumar, Advs. For the Respondents : Mr. S. Qammar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT 1. The present petition is filed challenging the order dated 28.09.2013 (hereafter ‘impugned order’), passed by the learned Trial Court, in CC No. 99/0109, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom. 2. By the impugned order, the learned Trial Court has summoned the petitioner for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’). 3. The brief facts of the case are as follows: 3.1. A complaint was filed by the complainant company/ Respondent No.2 (earlier known as M/s. Indiabulls Securities Ltd.) under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’) against the petitioner for the offence under Section 420 of the IPC. It 3.2. Thereafter, it is alleged that the accused peti