NIKUND KUMAR JHA vs STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.06.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1888/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1092/2025 NIKUND KUMAR JHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra and Mr. Ankit Dhawan, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for State. Mr. Sarthak Tomar, Advocate for Complainant. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 610/2024, registered at PS K.N. Katju Marg, North Delhi for offences under Section 498A/406/34 IPC, to which further offences including the offences under Section 376/328/354A/376D IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act were added in view of detailed statements of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 CrPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused/applicant contends that the accused/applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated because on his BAIL APPLN. 1888/2025 pages 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for prosecutrix opposes the bail application on the ground of severity of allegations. 4. Learned APP opposes the bail application on the ground that earlier, the accused/applicant was granted anticipatory bail by the Court of Sessions