Delhi High Court · 2025-06-12
NEWGEN IT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED vs NEWGEN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Citation / case number
- FAO (COMM)-73/2025 2025:DHC:4964-DB
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- NEWGEN IT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Respondent
- NEWGEN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Judgment text excerpt
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 12.03.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 12.06.2025 + FAO (COMM) 73/2025 + FAO (COMM) 75/2025 NEWGEN IT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar and Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Mr. Siddhant Chamola, Mr. Saurabh Seth, Mr. Prabhav Bahuguna, Ms. Pallavi Bhatnagar and Ms. Saijal Arora, Advocates. versus NEWGEN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi and Mr. Ankit Jain, Senior Advocates with Mr. J.V. Abhay, Mr. Dhruv Grover, Mr. Abhineet Kalia, Ms. Riya Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. FAO (COMM) 73/2025 & CM APPLs. 15151-52/2025, 15154/2025 FAO (COMM) 75/2025 & CM APPLs. 15161-62/2025, 15164/2025 1. The present appeals filed by the Appellant under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order XLIII Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA FAO (COMM) 73/2025 and 75/2025 Page 1 of 52 Signing Date:12.06.2025 11:37:37 Rule (1)(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, „CPC‟), impugn the Orders dated 27.02.2025 and 05.03.2025 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial)-05, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the „District Judge‟) in C.S.(COMM) No. 102/2025 titled as Newgen Software Technologies Limited v. Newgen IT Technologies Limited. 2. The learned District Judge, vide its Order dated 27.02.2025, granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of the Respondent, which forms the subject matter of FAO(COMM) 75/2025. Thereafter, vide Order dated 05.03.2025, the said ex-parte ad-interim injun