Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-06-24

NANDKUMAR INFRASTRUCTURE LLP THR. POA SHAMSUNDER SAHAJRAM CHHABAD vs THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION PUNE AND ORS

Citation / case number
WP/13895/2024
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
NANDKUMAR INFRASTRUCTURE LLP THR. POA SHAMSUNDER SAHAJRAM CHHABAD
Respondent
THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION PUNE AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

k 1/20 32 wp 13895.24 J db as.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.13895 OF 2024 Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP Through Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Shamsunder Shajiram Chhabad Age 44 years, Occ. Business, Having Office at “Trishul Palace” Plot No.30, Gulmohar Colony, Opposite ITI Gendamal, Satara 415 002. ....Petitioner Versus 1 The Superintendent Engineer National Highway Division, Pune Having office at Central Building 3, BJ Medical Rd., Agarkar Nagar, Pune 411 001 2 The Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, Pune, Having office at Bandhkam Bhavan, Opposite Hotel Sagar Plaza Camp, Pune 411 001. 3 The State of Maharashtra Through Public Works Department Mantralaya, Mumbai. 4 Shri Pranil Dattatray Gharge, Age Adult, Occ. Business, Residing at Dew Drop 1-10, Sonam Roasd, Saswad, Pune 5 Union of India Through Ministry of Road Transport & Highway Dayakar Bhavan, Maharshi Karve Road, New Marine Line, Churchgate, Mumbai – 20. ....Respondents _________ k Page No. 1 of 20 k 2/20 32 wp 13895.24 J db as.doc Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar i/b Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan, for the Petitioner. Ms. Neha S. Bhide, Government Pleader with Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, Additional GP and Ms. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. Mr. Tejas Deshmukh with Mr. H.D. Chavan, for Respondent No.4. Mr. Dashrath A. Dubey, for Respondent No.5. __________ CORAM: ALOK ARADHE, CJ. & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. RESERVED ON : 16 JUNE 2025. PRONOUNCED ON : 24 JUNE 2025. J U D G M E N T (Per : Sandeep V. Marne, J.): 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Petition is heard finally. 2. Petitioner has filed the present Petition challenging the decision of Respondent No.2 rejecting its

NANDKUMAR INFRASTRUCTURE LLP THR. POA SHAMSUNDER SAHAJRAM CHHABAD vs THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION PUNE AND ORS · Niyam