Bombay High Court · 2025-06-09
KAARYA FACILITIES AND SERVICES LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.
- Citation / case number
- WP/1524/2021
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- KAARYA FACILITIES AND SERVICES LTD.
- Respondent
- UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
JUDGMENT-WP-1524-2021(2).DOCX Chaitanya Digitally signed by CHAITANYA CHAITANYA ASHOK ASHOK JADHAV JADHAV Date: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 2025.06.10 15:12:34 +0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1524 OF 2021 Kaarya Facilities & Services Ltd (Private Limited till 13th Aug 2017) A Company Registered under the Companies Act 1956, having its registered address at Unit No 115 Inspire Hub, Western Heights J P Road, Opp Gurdwara 4 Bungalows Andheri West Mumbai 400058. Through its Director Mr Vineet Pandey … Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India Through Department of Revenue Minister of Finance Having its address at Room No. 46, North Block, … Respondents New Delhi-110 001. 2. Designated Committee SVLDRS Mumbai Zone Having its address at GST Bhawan, Maharshi Karve Road opp Churchgate Station; Mumbai 400002. 3. Director General GST Intelligence (DGGI) Mumbai Zone Having its address at 3rd Floor, NTC House, 15, N.M. Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai- 400001. Page 1 of 8 JUDGMENT-WP-1524-2021(2).DOCX 4. Deputy Commissioner Division X of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai West Having its address at Samant Estate Takashashila Building, besides Jay Prakash Nagar, Goregaon Mumbai 400063. ______________________________________________________ Mr Akash Rebello a/w Mr Nadeem Shama, Mr Paras Gosar i/b Mr Shouvik Kumar Roy, for Petitioner. Mr Jitendra B. Mishra a/w Mr Ashutosh Mishra, Mr Rupesh Dubey, for Respondents. ______________________________________________________ CORAM : M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED : 09 JUNE 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT :(Per M. S. Sonak, J.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The rule is made returnable immediately at the request and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner challenges t