INDIAMART INTERMESH LTD. vs PUMA SE

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on: 02.06.2025 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 6/2024, CM APPL. 2216 & 2219 of 2024 INDIAMART INTERMESH LTD. ..... Appellant Versus PUMA SE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Mr Rajshekhar Rao, Sr Advocates with Mr Sidharth Chopra, Mr Nitin Sharma, Mr Naman Tandon, Mr Kuber Mahajan, Ms Riya Kumar, Mr Sumer Saeth and Mr Harshil Wason, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Ranjan Narula, Mr. Shakti Priyan Nair and Mr. Parth Bajaj, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J. 1. The appellant – IndiaMART Intermesh Limited [IIL] has filed the present intra-court appeal, inter alia, impugning a judgment dated 03.01.2024 [impugned judgment] passed by the learned Single Judge in an 2. PSE has filed the aforementioned suit [being CS(COMM) 607/2021], inter alia, seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining IIL from using, facilitating, or offering to any third parties the trademark ‘PUMA’ as a brand suggestion/keyword/search term on its website <www.indiamart.com> or use the mark ‘PUMA’ in any manner which may am