Bombay High Court · 2025-06-30
GlobeOp Financial Services India Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, MUM NOD E 0901, MALAD WEST 501, Nodal 09, Mumbai
- Citation / case number
- WP/2827/2025
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- GlobeOp Financial Services India Private Limited
- Respondent
- Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, MUM NOD E 0901, MALAD WEST 501, Nodal 09, Mumbai
Judgment text excerpt
2025:BHC-OS:10125-DB Sayyed 21-WP(L).12528.2025.(J).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.12528 OF 2025 GlobeOp Financial Services (India) Private Limited (Surviving entity after merger of GlobeOp Financial Services Technologies (India) Private Limited with GlobeOp Financial Services (India) Private Limited, effective from 01.02.2022 A company incorporated under the laws of India, having its registered office at 5th Floor, 501/502, Interface Building No.16, Malad West, Mumbai Suburban, Maharashtra – 400 064 ...Petitioner Versus 1. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, (MUM-NOD-E-0901), Malad_West_ 501, Nodal-09, Mumbai, Old Building, Cabin No.C-14, 5th Floor, GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai – 400 010 2. State of Maharashtra, Through the Commissioner of State Tax, GST Bhavan, Balwant Singh Dodhi Marg, Mazgaon, Mumbai – 400 010 3. Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue through the Secretary (Revenue), North Block, New Delhi – 110 001 ...Respondents _____________________________________________________ Mr. Rohan Shah, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Mohammed Anajwalla, Ms. Chandni Tanna & Mr. Prathamesh Chavan i/b. India Law Alliance for the Petitioner. Ms. Prachi Tatake, Addl. G. P. for Respondent No.1. Ms. Shruti Vyas a/w Ms. Suman Kumar Das for Respondent No.3. _____________________________________________________ Page 1 of 13 Sayyed 21-WP(L).12528.2025.(J).docx CORAM : M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED : 30 June 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT:-(Per M. S. Sonak, J.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. This petition challenges the impugned order dated 24 February 2025, issu