Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-06-27

AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS INDIA LIMITED vs DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD

Citation / case number
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)-470/2025 2025:DHC:5033
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS INDIA LIMITED
Respondent
DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD

Judgment text excerpt

$~ SB-25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27th June, 2025 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 470/2025 AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS INDIA LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ishika Chauhan, Advocate. versus DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for respondent with Mr. N.K. Singh and Ms. Aliza Alam, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 29A of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 whereby the petitioner, who is claimant before the learned Arbitral Tribunal, seeks extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal which is due to expire on 30.06.2025. 2. Admittedly, this is third application of its kind. The mandate was earlier extended on 19.10.2023 and again on 01.10.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent appears on advance notice and submits that she would also have no objection if the mandate is extended. 4. It is also submitted by learned counsel for both the parties that the case has already reached the stage of final arguments and there is every likelihood of the matter getting culminated very shortly. 5. It is also submitted that that the substantial time has taken place on Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 470/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:28.06.2025 12:51:35 account of the complexities of the issues involved and voluminous record. 6. It is also apprised that though the matter is otherwise fixed for hearing of final arguments, in the interregnum, an application under Section 17 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has also been moved from the side of the respondent and, therefore, the mandate be suitably extended. 7. Keeping in mind the facts presented before this Court

AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS INDIA LIMITED vs DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD · Niyam