X vs STATE & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Pronounced on: 17th July, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 2984/2023 Ms. X D/o XYZXYZ R/o XYZXYZ NEW DELHI-110017 .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, Senior Adv. with Ms. Aditi Shivadhatri, Ms. Prerna Singh, Ms. Jagriti Singh, Ms. Mamta Saha, Mr. Amit Peswani and Mr. Ankur Raghav, Advocates. versus 1. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) through SHO, PS Saket New Delhi-110017 2. ABHISHEK PARUTHI S/o Sh. R. K. Paruthi R/o H. N0.193, Gulmohar Enclave New Delhi – 110049. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State with SI Udai Singh, P.S.Saket. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Mr. Dhruv Chaudhary, Ms. Pallavi Garg, Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Mr. Shubham Sourav, Advocates for Respondent No.2 along with R-2 in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. CRL.M.C. 2984/2023 Page 1 of 27 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:17.07.2025 18:38:23 1. Petition under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ―Cr.P.C.‖) has been filed by the Petitioner/Ms. X seeking quashing of Order dated 19.04.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi setting aside Order of learned M.M. dated 02.06.2022, whereby blood sample of Respondent No.2/Abhishek Paruthi was permitted to be taken for DNA analysis. 2. Briefly stated, on the Complaint made by the Petitioner / Prosecutrix, FIR No.176/2021 under Sections 354/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ―IPC‖) PS Saket, was registered against accused Karan Paruthi, elder brother of Respondent No.2/Abhishek Paruthi. On the statement of Petitioner recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., Sections 326/313/354/34 IPC were added against Respondent No.2/Abh