Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-07-25

WRIT - C No. 22221 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 22221 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 22221 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

A.F.R. Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123012 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22221 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dina Nath Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nikhil Kumar,Vagish Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rakesh Singh Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Heard, Sri Nikhil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Nandlal Maurya, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Rakesh Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 5. 2. The core dispute involved in the present writ petition is purely legal one that as to whether the appellate Court, without adverting to the question of Limitation as prescribed under section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, could have admitted and allowed the time-barred appeal vide order dated 26.04.2023 and the impugned order dated 17.05.2025 respectively. This Court with the consent of the learned counsels representing their respective parties; proceeds to decide the present writ petition finally at the stage of admission itself, without inviting counter affidavit. 3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have assaile

WRIT - C No. 22221 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam