Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-07-28

WRIT - C No. 1004469 of 2005 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1004469 of 2005 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1004469 of 2005 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

A.F.R. Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43714 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1004469 of 2005 Petitioner :- Vishwanath Umar Vaisya And Anr. Respondent :- Additional Commissioner Allahabad And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Girish Chandra Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sampurnanand Hon'ble Irshad Ali,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri G.C. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has informed to Sri Sampurnanand, learned counsel for the respondent, who is representing Nagar Palika, Pratapgarh, who has received the notice, but is not present. 4. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 7.6.2003 and 31.3.2005, contained as Annexures-1 and 2, passed by respondent Nos.2 and 1 respectively. It is further prayed for issuance of writ of mandamus commanding the respondent No.2 to delete the name of respondent No.3 from the revenue records regarding plot No. 1330 of Village Ranjeetpur Chilbila. 5. Factual matrix of the case is that in the year 1879, the district Pratapgarh was carved out from the district Raebareli. In 1872, th

WRIT - C No. 1004469 of 2005 at Lucknow · Niyam