Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-07-07

WRIT - A No. 8257 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 8257 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 8257 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:105748 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8257 of 2025 Petitioner :- Priti Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ambuj Maurya,Ayush Kumar Shukla,Madhaw Pandey,Shashank Pandey Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard Sri Madhaw Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. In compliance of the earlier order of this Court learned Standing Counsel has obtained instruction in the matter and as per instruction physical efficiency test was held from 20.05.2025 to 28.05.2025 and thereafter the process has been undertaken for final result. He has also relied upon authority of this Court in the case of Sangita Baghel v. State of U.P. and others:Writ A No.8620 of 2020 decided vide order dated 18.11.2020 in which it was observed that only matter of physical efficiency test itself cannot be adjourned for personal convenience of the candidates. The background of the case is that the petitioner was earlier having pregnancy and gave birth to caesarean baby on 12.04.2025. Resultantly, she was not fit to undergo exercise of any kind which may be required in the physical efficiency test conducted by

WRIT - A No. 8257 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam