Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-07-01

WRIT - A No. 2846 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2846 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2846 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:101258 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2846 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Autar Singh Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Goel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing State respondents. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has challenged the order of recovery proceedings initiated by the respondents for alleged wrongful pay fixation for which it was claimed that petitioner got paid excess amount of salary. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner was not at all responsible for any particular pay fixation which is alleged by the respondents to have been wrongly done and has resulted in excess payment of salary to the petitioner. Pleadings to this effect has been taken in the writ petition. 4. Besides above it is argued that even if the correction was to be carried out and it was determined that petitioner had been paid excess salary, then no recovery could have been made from him, he being not responsible for the same. Thus, learned counsel for the pet

WRIT - A No. 2846 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam