VINOD RAJORIA vs MOHINDER KUMAR VERMA

Judgment text excerpt

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 131/2022 & I.As. 3607/2022, 2108/2023 6761/2023, 6771/2023, 31220/2024, 5759/2025 VINOD RAJORIA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg and Ms. Rachna Agrawal along with Mr. Vinod Rajoria, Plaintiff versus MOHINDER KUMAR VERMA .....Defendant Through: Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, Ms. Aadhyaa Khanna and Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocates Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Syal and Mr. Shreyan Das, Advocates for Applicants in I.A. No. 2108/2023, 6771/2023, 6761/2023 % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER 22.07.2025 MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J : 1. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking specific performance of the Receipt-cum-Agreement to Sell dated 11.12.2019 (‘ATS’) executed between the Plaintiff and Defendant, with respect to land measuring 1 Bigha 12 Biswa comprised in Khasra No. 185/1 min East (1-03) and Khasra Signature Not Verified Signed By:HEMANT CS(OS) 131/2022 Page 1 of 21 PRATAP SINGH Signing Date:24.07.2025 21:03:25 No. 185/2 min East (0-09), situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Khanpur, Tehsil Mehrauli, Sainik Farms, New Delhi, along with the super-structure, tube-wells, boundary wall etc. built thereon and marked as ‘Plot A’ in the Site Plan annexed with the Sale Deed dated 16.04.1993 (‘Subject Plot’). 1.1. The Plaintiff in the alternative seeks refund of the part sale consideration paid under the ATS. 1.2. The Plaintiff inter-alia seeks relief of permanent injunction against the Defendant from selling, alienating or creating any third-party interest in any manner with respect to the title and possession of the Subject Plot. 2. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Vide order dated 26.05.2025, time for filin