VINOD KUMAR vs KULWANT SINGH & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18.07.2025 + CM(M) 108/2025 & CM APPL. 3235/2025 VINOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Mr. Sonu, Mr. Rohan Aggarwal, Mr. Jai Kumar, Advocates. versus KULWANT SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Ms. Ira Singh & Mr. Aryan Dhaka, Advocates for R-3/UOI with Insp. Vivekanand, SHO. Prashant Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. By an order dated 28.01.2025, the predecessor Bench of this Court, after hearing the submissions on behalf of the Petitioner in the matter, had passed the following directions: “3. It is the case of the petitioner that no written statement was filed by him before the learned Tribunal. It is alleged that the signature of the petitioner was forged. The petitioner has placed on record the copy of written statement filed before the learned Tribunal. The same appears to have been filed through an advocate, namely, Mr. S.P. Sharma. 4. The petitioner is stated to have also filed a complaint before P.S. Prashant Vihar in that regard. 5. Let the State he impleaded as a necessary party in the present petition. On filing amended memo of parties by the petitioner within a week, notice be issued to the State through the learned Standing Counsel, returnable on 17.07.2025. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:23.07.2025 CM(M) 108/2025 Page 1 of 3 02:18:36 6. Status report be also filed by the State in regard to the investigation, before the next date of hearing. 7. The execution of the award dated 29.07.2017 is stayed against the petitioner herein. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not impeded the learned Executing Court from proceeding further against the other respond