VIKRAM SINGH vs STATE THROUGH SUBHASH PLACE POLICE STATION

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 18.07.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + BAIL APPLN. 4380/2024 VIKRAM SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Goswami, Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Mr. Mohak Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH SUBHASH PLACE POLICE STATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP with SI Neeraj Kumar, PS-Subhash Place. Mr. Basant Kumar Singh and Mr. Harsh Raj Singh, Adv. for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT (ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. CRL.M.A. 35833/2024 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 4380/2024 1. The present bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 97/2021 registered under Sections 420/120B/34 IPC Bail Appln. 4380/2024 Page 1 of 6 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:19.07.2025 16:30:04 at P.S. Subhash Place. 2. The brief facts of the present case are that the complainant, a property dealer in Burari and partner of Rajan Seth, alleged that in May 2018, he was approached by the applicant, Vikram Singh and co- accused Anjaneyan Ullanattu who introduced themselves as having business in UAE through M/s AL Manakh Managements Consultancy, Sharjah, engaged in distribution and screening of South Indian films. Allegedly, on the pretext of high returns and transfer of 10% company shares, the complainant was induced to invest ₹1.25 crore through cash and bank transactions over one year. The complainant claims the shares were never transferred, and a post-dated cheque issued by the co-accused was dishonoured. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that no money was ever transferred to the applicant in connection with the commission of the alleged offence, nor was he involved i