VIJENDER KUMAR vs DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10179/2025, CM APPLs. 42272/2025, 42273/2025 & 42274/2025 VIJENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishaank Mattoo, Ms. Sanjivani Pattjoshi, Mr. Rishabh Munjal and Mr. Devrishi Tyagi, Advs. versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for DMRC Ms. Ekta Choudhary, Mr. Ayush Kumar and Ms. Kanika Kalra, Advs. for R-2 Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. for GNCTD/R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 18.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assails judgment dated 1 July 2025, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 2347/20242. By the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has dismissed the OA. Aggrieved thereby, 1 “the Tribunal”, hereinafter 2 Vijender Kumar v DMRC and Ors. 2. We have heard Mr. Nishaank Mattoo, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ankur Chhibber, learned Counsel for Respondent 1 at length. 3. Several prayers were made before the Tribunal, and stand reiterated before this Court. However, only two prayers have substantially been ur