VIDYA RAI vs NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~125 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on: 11.07.2025 + W.P.(C) 8389/2025 VIDYA RAI .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person. versus NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Khanna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Mr. Tarandeep Singh and Ms. Vilakshana Dayma, Advs. for R- l/NTA Mr. Devashish Bhadauria, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-2/UOI. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal and Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Advs. for University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J 1. The controversy in the present writ petition revolves around challenge to four questions and their answer key(s), in LL.M. Entrance Exam. 2. The case set out by the petitioner in the present petition is that she is a law graduate from Faculty of Law, B.H.U. (Varanasi) and had applied for Post-Graduate Entrance Examination conducted by respondent no.1/NTA namely, Common University Entrance Test (CUET-PG) 2025 for LL.M with subject code COQP-14. 3. The petitioner applied for LL.M. (COQP-14) on 19.01.2025 and Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEEPAK SINGH W.P.(C) 8389/2025 Page 1 of 10 Signing Date:11.07.2025 20:54:48 appeared in the entrance examination that was held on 26.03.2025. As per the petitioner, out of the total 75 questions, there were approximately three questions in the entrance examination that contains incorrect options i.e. none of the options provided were correct and besides that, there was other question for which answer provided in the provisional answer key was incorrect. 4. On 22.04.2025, the respondent no.1/NTA released the provisional answer keys for the code COQP-14 and invited objections from the candidates. As per the provisional answer keys, petitioner got 182 marks. 5.