UNION OF INDIA & ORS. vs EX HAV MACP NB SUB DILEEP KUMAR

Judgment text excerpt

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10246/2025 & CM APPL. 42556/2025 & CM APPL. 42557/2025 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, SPC Major Anish Muralidhar Army versus EX HAV MACP NB SUB DILEEP KUMAR .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 18.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This petition assails order dated 8 February 2024 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal1 in OA 1777/2023 whereby the respondent’s application for grant of disability pension on the ground that he suffers from Primary Hypertension with 30% rounded off to 50 % disability have been allowed by the AFT. 2. The issue is covered by a recent decision rendered by us in UOI v Ex Sub Gawas Anil Madso2. 3. Nonetheless, we have heard Mr. Himanshu Pathak, learned 1 “the AFT”, hereinafter W.P.(C) 10246/2025 Signature Not Verified Page 1 of 8 Signed By:AAKANSHA SHARMA Signing Date:22.07.2025 19:21:34 Senior Panel Counsel for the petitioner, and have perused the record. 4. The respondent was released in Low Medical Category on his being found to be suffering from Primary Hypertension. From the record, including the proceedings of the Release Medical Board3, the following facts emerged: (i) The respondent had served in the Territorial Army for over 20 years before he was diagnosed as suffering from Primary Hypertension. (ii) The respondent, in his self-declaration, specifically declared that he had not been suffering from Primary Hypertension prior to joining the Territorial Army. The declaration reads thus: 2 (a). Did you suffer from any disability before joining the Armed Forces? If so give details and dates: NO The correctness of this declaration is not doubted either by the RMB or by the