Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-29

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. vs CMDA ANAND BALAKRISHNAN

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-8288/2025 2025:DHC:6233-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Respondent
CMDA ANAND BALAKRISHNAN
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8288/2025, CM APPLs. 36086/2025, 36087/2025 & 36088/2025 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC versus CMDA ANAND BALAKRISHNAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shakti Chand Jaiswal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 29.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This petition assails order dated 29 November 2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal1 in OA 2502/2022 whereby the respondent’s application for grant of disability pension on the ground that he suffers from Diabetes Mellitus Type-II2 has been allowed by the AFT relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Dharamvir Singh v UOI3. 2. The issue is covered by a recent decision rendered by us in UOI v Ex Sub Gawas Anil Madso4. 1 “the AFT”, hereinafter 2 “DM-II”, hereinafter 3 (2013) 7 SCC 316 4 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018 W.P.(C) 8288/2025 3. Nonetheless, we have heard Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, learned CGSC for the petitioners, and have perused the record. 4. The respondent was released in Low Medical Category on his being found to be suffering from DM-II. From the record, including the proceedi

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. vs CMDA ANAND BALAKRISHNAN · Niyam