Delhi High Court · 2025-07-16
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. vs BHOJ RAJ SINGH (EX JWO)
- Citation / case number
- W.P.(C)-10012/2025 2025:DHC:5759-DB
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
- Respondent
- BHOJ RAJ SINGH (EX JWO)
Judgment text excerpt
$~111 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10012/2025, CM APPL. 41664/2025 & CM APPL. 41665/2025 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC. versus BHOJ RAJ SINGH (EX JWO) .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 16.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This petition assails order dated 22 May 2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal1 in OA 1456/2019 whereby the respondent’s application for grant of disability pension on the ground that he suffers from Diabetes Mellitus Type-II2 has been allowed by the AFT relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Dharamvir Singh v UOI3. 2. The issue is covered by a recent decision rendered by us in UOI v Ex Sub Gawas Anil Madso4. 1 “the AFT”, hereinafter 2 “DM-II”, hereinafter 3 (2013) 7 SCC 316 4 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018 W.P.(C) 10012/2025 Signature Not Verified Page 1 of 8 Signed By:AAKANSHA SHARMA Signing Date:18.07.2025 17:07:11 3. Nonetheless, we have heard Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the petitioners, and have perused the record. 4. The respondent was released in Low Medical Category on his being found to be suffering from DM-II. From the record, including the proceedings of the Release Medical Board5, the following facts emerged: (i) The respondent had served in the Indian Air Force for over 23 years and 17 days before he was diagnosed as suffering from DM-II. (ii) The respondent, in his self-declaration, specifically declared that he had not been suffering from DM-II prior to joining the Indian Air Force. The declaration reads thus: 3. Did you suffer from any disability before joining the Armed Forces? If so give details and dates: NO The correctness of this decla