UNION OF INDIA & ANR. vs SAMEER DNYANDEV WANKHEDE

Judgment text excerpt

$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 21.07.2025 + W.P.(C) 10362/2025 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Iskaran Singh Bhandari, CGSC with Mr. Piyush Yadav, Adv. versus SAMEER DNYANDEV WANKHEDE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Arvind Nayar Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nikhil Palli, Mr. Jatin Prashar, Mr. Shadab Anwar, Mr. Niyati Razdan, Ms. Bhavya Sharma, Mr. Vidushya Parth, Ms. Diksha and Mr. Shubham, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CAV 267/2025 1. Mr. Nikhil Palli, the learned counsel, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent. 2. In view of the above, the caveat stands discharged. CM APPL. 42969/2025 (Exemption) 3. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 10362/2025 AND CM APPL. 42966-68/2025 Signature Not Verified Signed W.P(C) 10362/2025 By:PRIYADARSHANI JAIN Page 1 of 6 Signing Date:28.07.2025 18:30:02 4. This petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 20.02.2025 (hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Order) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as „Tribunal‟) in O.A. No. 3677/2024, titled Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede v. Union Of India & Anr., allowing the OA filed by the respondent herein and setting aside the Order dated 30.05.2022 (hereinafter referred to as „Transfer Order‟), whereby the petitioner had transferred the respondent from Directorate General of Analytics and Risk Management, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as „DGARM‟) to the Directorate General of Taxpayer Service, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as DGTS). 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Tribunal has committed various errors in the Impugned Orde