SUNIL@MAYA vs STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 10.07.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 3474/2024 & CRL.M.A. 29123/2024 SUNIL@MAYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhas Mishra, Advocate Versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Additional Public Prosecutor for State for State with SI Vikash Fageria, PS Subzi Mandi Ms. Tanya Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR SHALINDER KAUR, J (ORAL) 1. By way of the present petition under Section 483 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No. 303/2014 dated 26.06.2014, under Sections 302, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25, 27, 25 (54) and 59 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Subzi Mandi, Delhi. 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the abovesaid FIR was lodged on the statement of the complainant - Kamal Kumar @ Sonu, Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed BAIL APPLN. 3474/2024 Page 1 of 9 By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Date:11.07.2025 19:02:23 on 26.06.2014 who alleged that on 25.06.2014, he along with Harish, Kamal, Rajeev @ Bunty, Sonu @ Pehlwan, Lala, and Giriraj, was partying at Subzi Mandi Railway Station, near Deenanath Road. At around 9:30 PM to 10:00 PM, the accused persons, namely, Karan, Sunil @ Kalu, Deepesh, Sunny @ Rakesh @ Sanjay, Vikrant, and Surender, arrived at the spot and started abusing Lala. When Rajeev @ Bunty and Sonu @ Pehlwan objected to such conduct, the accused persons became agitated and threatened them to remain present at the same place. It is further stated that the situation was, however, pacified by Rajeev @ Bunty, where-after the accused persons left the place. 3. At around 11:00 PM to 11:15 PM, whil