SULABH ARORA ANR ORS vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 02.07.2025 + W.P.(CRL) 1349/2025 SULABH ARORA ANR ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Somya Chugh and Mr. Gurmit Singh, Advs. with P-1 in person. P -2 and P-3 present through VC. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for State. Ms. Vijay Sachdeva, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR SHALINDER KAUR, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 12680/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 1349/2025, CRL.M.A. 12776/2025 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the FIR bearing No. 551/2024 dated 22.07.2024 for offences punishable under Sections 406/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 1349/2025 Page 1 of 5 By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Date:03.07.2025 16:59:55 at Police Station Bhalswa Dairy and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that that the petitioner no. 1, petitioner no. 2 and petitioner no. 3 are the husband, mother-in-law and sister-in-law, respectively, of the respondent no. 2. He submits that the marriage of the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 was solemnized on 03.12.2024, in accordance with the Hindu rites and customs at Delhi and no child was born out of the said wedlock. 5. He submits that owing to certain misunderstandings that arose between them, the parties could not leave peacefully since 07.04.2021. Furthermore, the marriage of the petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 suffered an irretrievable breakdown. The incompatible beha