SUBHASISH SAHA vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1195/2025 SUBHASISH SAHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with IO/SI Hemant. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 275/2024 of PS Special Cell for the offence under Section 420/120B IPC. 2. In pre-lunch session today, the application was partly heard and the matter was passed over at request of the learned ASC as he needed some more time to examine the brief. In view of wordings of the FIR, the narration of the alleged offence was recorded in presence of the learned ASC and the IO in simplified manner in pre-lunch session as follows: i. After part arguments, learned ASC accompanied with the IO seeks a passover to examine the chats. Those chats were not filed despite the last order, though learned counsel for the accused/applicant has examined the same. BAIL APPLN. 1195/2025 pages 3. In this post-lunch session, learned ASC supported by the IO/SI Hemant submits that in the pre-lunch session, the factual matrix expla