SUBHASISH SAHA vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1195/2025 SUBHASISH SAHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with IO/SI Hemant. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 275/2024 of PS Special Cell for the offence under Section 420/120B IPC. 2. In pre-lunch session today, the application was partly heard and the matter was passed over at request of the learned ASC as he needed some more time to examine the brief. In view of wordings of the FIR, the narration of the alleged offence was recorded in presence of the learned ASC and the IO in simplified manner in pre-lunch session as follows: i. After part arguments, learned ASC accompanied with the IO seeks a passover to examine the chats. Those chats were not filed despite the last order, though learned counsel for the accused/applicant has examined the same. BAIL APPLN. 1195/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH Signature Not Verified GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.15 17:42:27 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:15.07.2025 18:24:42 ii. For convenience, the factual matrix simplified with the assistance of the IO is as follows. The complainant came in contact with the accused and the latter started giving him professional tips of investment of money. One such tip given to the complainant was to invest in crypto currency through different companies, which was done by the complainant. The money was transferred by the complainant to those different companies. Later, when the complainant asked the accused/applicant to wind up his account, the accused/applicant demand