SMT. VIMLA CHOPRA (NEE KWATRA) vs LALL G. KWATRA AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15th July, 2025 + CM(M) 910/2025 & CM APPL. 29572/2025 SMT. VIMLA CHOPRA (NEE KWATRA) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Manchanda and Mr. Sidhharth Mullick, Ms.Shalini Bhardwaj, Mr. Aditya Sharma andMr. Vedic Thukral, Advocates. versus LALL G. KWATRA AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. P K Rawal and Mr. Tarun Agarwal, Advocates. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Ms. Mamta Gautam and Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocates for Respondent no. 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Mr. Kirti Uppal, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner and Mr. P K Rawal, learned counsel for respondents (except respondent Nos. 2, 8 and 9) submit that they would have no objection if the impugned order dated 09.04.2025, is put in abeyance and, in the interregnum, the learned Trial Court is directed to explore the possibility of inter se bidding with respect to the property in question. 2. It is also apprised that there are strong chances of there being amicable settlement between the parties though fact, however, remains that some of the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 910/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:17.07.2025 18:36:12 respondents in the present petition are yet to be served. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is, hereby, disposed of with the direction that the impugned order dated 09.04.2025 shall remain in abeyance and the learned Executing Court would find out, after ensuring due service of execution petition upon all the parties concerned, whether inter se bidding with respect to the property in question can take place or not. 4. In case, the learned Executing Court, after hearing all such parties, is of the view that it is not possible to go for inte