SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD vs MAMTA & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 14.07.2025 MAC.APP. 685/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Nandwani, Advocate versus MAMTA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Chauriha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking to challenge the Award dated 14.03.2013 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, MACT, Rohini Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Award”]. By the Impugned Award, a sum of Rs. 65,64,340/- has been granted to the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5/Claimants along with 9% interest. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant fairly submits that the only ground for challenge in the present Appeal is the grant of compensation for future prospects. However, in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi & Ors.1 1 (2017) 16 SCC 680 3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submits that given the judgment in the Pranay Sethi case, the Appeal has become infructuous. 4. The Supreme Court in Pran