SHAHNAJ vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.07.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2233/2025 SHAHNAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sharwan Kumar Tiwari, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with IO/ASI Chander Pal CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant, arrested on 18.04.2025, seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 353/2025 of PS Jahangir Puri for offences under Section 21/25/29 NDPS Act. 2. Broadly speaking, even according to the prosecution case, no contraband was recovered from the accused/applicant, though she is involved in conspiracy. On last date, the learned APP submitted that the only evidence of conspiracy against the accused/applicant is her telephonic connectivity with the main accused Paras. On last date, the IO had shown Call Detail Records (CDRs) reflecting multiple telephone calls between the accused/applicant and accused Paras. But that day there was no Customer BAIL APPLN. 2233/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.24 17:58:54 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:24.07.2025 18:07:17 Application Form (CAF) to show that the telephone numbers being shown to the court belonged to the accused/applicant and accused Paras, so the matter was adjourned at the request of learned APP for further investigation. 3. Today, learned APP assisted by IO/ASI Chanderpal has produced the photocopies of CAF of two telephones, one of which is in the name of the accused/applicant while the other is in the name of accused Paras. Learned APP submits that there were more than 850 telephone calls exchanged between the accused/applicant and the accused Paras. Apart from this, there i