Delhi High Court · 2025-07-03
SH. SACHIN TOMAR vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) AND OTHERS
- Citation / case number
- CRL.M.C.-755/2025 2025:DHC:5212
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SH. SACHIN TOMAR
- Respondent
- STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) AND OTHERS
Judgment text excerpt
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 03.07.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 755/2025 SH. SACHIN TOMAR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Parul Verma, Advocate. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND OTHERS … Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP. SI Sachin Panwar, PS-Fatehpur Beri, SI Devender, PS-Sangam Vihar. Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0269/2021, dated 05.06.2021, registered at P.S Fatehpur Beri under sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. The marriage between Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 was solemnized on 08.02.2018 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies at CRL.M.C. 755/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:03.07.2025 17:49:13 Delhi. No child was born out of the said wedlock. It is submitted that due to temperamental differences, the couple started living separately since 06.10.2019. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 filed complaint under section 12, 18, 19, 20 and 22 of DV Act and also lodged the aforesaid FIR against Petitioner No.1 and his family members. The Petitioner No.1 filed a petition under section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act bearing HMA no. 2440/2019. 3. During the proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed a Settlement Deed dated 22.02.2024. In pursuance of the Settlement, the parties jointly filed a fresh petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The learned Family Court, Saket Courts allowed the mutual divo