SANJEEV KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Judgment text excerpt

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3989/2025 SANJEEV KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ....Respondents Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 11.07.2025 Review Petition 371/2025 1. We have heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, the review petitioner, who appears in person and presses Review Pet. 371/2025, which seeks review of judgment dated 29 May 2025 passed by this Bench by which WP (C) 3989/2025 was dismissed. 2. The review petitioner submits that there are six errors in the impugned order. 3. We deal with them seriatim. 4. The first error to which the petitioner draws attention is in the expansion of the abbreviation “LMED” contained in para 1 of our Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 3989/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 5 KUMAR Signing Date:14.07.2025 16:28:25 judgment. He submits “LMED” stands for “Leading Medical”. He is unable to show us any document in support of this submission. In any event, the issue hardly affects the final decision taken on the writ petition. We, however, note the petitioner’s submission 5. The second alleged error to which the review petitioner draws our attention is supposedly contained in para 3 of our judgment, which reads thus: “3. The petitioner was posted to INHS Sanjivani, Kochi, vide transfer order dated 07.10.2022. On 26.12.2022, he submitted a representation seeking cancellation of the said transfer and posting to Delhi area on compassionate grounds. The representation referred to both his medical condition and his spouse’s place of posting.” 6. We are constrained to observe with some discomfort, the submission of the review petitioner that the recital in para 3 of our judgment