SANA TALHA KHAN Alias Sana Sirajuddin Mukadam vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Judgment text excerpt

LSP 1 4 wpst 13372.25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition(st) No.13372 of 2025 Sana Talha Khan alias Sana Sirajuddin Mukadam 1403, Sosiyo Apartment Belverder Hill, Near Mazagaon Garden Mumbai 400010. … Petitioner V/s. 1. State of Maharashtra 2. Azeem Sirajuddin Mukadam Flat No.402 Yash Heights, Nesbit Road Mazgaon, Mumbai 400 010. … Respondents. Mr. M.A. Khan a/w. H.I. Advocate for the Petitioner. Sirguroh, Ms. Mohsina Khan and Aasma Shah, Ms. Dipti Mehta Ms. Sangita E. Phad APP for the State. Mr. Prashant Thombre a/w. Mr. Advocate for the Respondent Moinuddin Khan No.2. Digitally signed by CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J LATA LATA SUNIL SUNIL PANJWANI PANJWANI Date: 2025.07.30 DATE : 14th July 2025. 18:58:57 +0530 ORAL JUDGMENT : Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner-Accused No.1 and learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2-first informant and learned APP. LSP 2 4 wpst 13372.25.doc 2. The issue involved in this petition is “about right of the first informant to address the Court orally by opposing the discharge application filed by the Petitioner”. The FIR came to be registered with Byculla Police Station in pursuance to directions given under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.. The charge-sheet came to be filed against the present Petitioner and others. There is an objection taken about respecting the process of law by the Petitioner. That is to say she has not complied with the conditions of anticipatory bail. This is a contentious issue. This needs to be addressed by the trial Court. 3. There is discharge application filed by the Petitioner. The first informant is already permitted by the trial Court to intervene in the proceedings. The first informant wants enlargement of such right and that is why he applied befor