SACHIN RAJPUT vs STATE AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 11.07.2025 + CRL.M.C. 2141/2025 SACHIN RAJPUT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Adv. for the petitioner along with petitioner. versus STATE AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with SI Shubham Singh, PS Naraina and ASI Niranjanlal. Mr. Sandeep Singh Nainwal Adv. for the respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR SHALINDER KAUR, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 9583/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2141/2025 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the FIR No. 386/2019 dated 26.12.2019 for offences Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 2141/2025 Page 1 of 4 By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Date:12.07.2025 15:56:35 punishable under Sections 323/341/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Naraina (“subject FIR”) and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, qua the petitioner. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent no. 2 and the petitioner are living in the same vicinity, however, on 25.12.2019, due to some a verbal alteration resulting into a scuffle led to registration of the subject FIR, against the petitioner and a co-accused person, and filing of litigations by respondent no. 2. He further submits that the petitioner has clean antecedents and the chargesheet in the subject FIR has been filed before the Trial Court. 5. It is submitted that with with the intervention of family members, relatives, and mutual acquaintances, the parties have arrived at an amicable and voluntary resolution of all disputes persisting between them vide Settl