Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-31

ROHIT KHATRI ALIAS JONTY vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-2845/2025 2025:DHC:6272
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ROHIT KHATRI ALIAS JONTY
Respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 31.07.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2845/2025 & CRL.M.A. 22158/2025 ROHIT KHATRI ALIAS JONTY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hariom, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Sudhir Rathi and SI Dinesh Kumar, PS NIA CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 514/2025 of PS Narela Industrial Area for offence under Section 109(1)/351(2)/118(1)/126(2)/3(5) of BNS. Briefly stated, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that he alongwith co-accused Abhishek Khatri assaulted the victim with iron rod, sticks and iron stand, thereby causing multiple fractures on both his lower and upper limbs. 2. The learned Court of Sessions dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the accused/applicant, recording that the injured suffered several fractures in both upper and lower limbs. BAIL APPLN. 2845/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified Date: 2025.07.31 17:14:46 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:31.07.2025 17:55:18 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant contended that he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the accused/applicant has been joining investigation as and when directed. 4. Keeping in mind the observation of the learned Court of Sessions that the victim suffered multiple fractures, the IO was directed to show the investigation file. The MLR dated 29.05.2025 does reflect multiple lacerated wounds and tenderness over both limbs, but also records that x-ray could not be performed due to unavailability of functional x-ray machines. Evidently, correct picture

ROHIT KHATRI ALIAS JONTY vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI · Niyam