RITA RIKH vs ARVIND KUMAR GAUTAM

Judgment text excerpt

$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21st July, 2025 + CM(M) 1280/2025& CM APPL. 42845/2025 RITA RIKH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Bansal, Advocate. versus ARVIND KUMAR GAUTAM .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is plaintiff before learned Trial Court and is aggrieved by order dated 16.05.2025 whereby the learned Trial Court has declined to make any reference of contempt against the defendant for wilful disobedience of the directions recorded in order dated 12.10.2023. 2. Order dated 12.10.2023 reads as under:- “6 CS DJ ADJ 777/23 RITA RIKH Vs. ARVIND KUMAR GAUTAM 12.10.2023 Present: Sh. Rohit Bansal, Ld counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Abhimanyu Lall, Ld counsel for the defendant. Sh. Abhimanyu Lall, advocate has filed the vakalatnama on behalf of defendant. Taken on record. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 1280/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:23.07.2025 17:47:51 Ld counsel for defendant has stated that he is ready to pay the decided rent agreed upon w.e.f. October 2023. In view of the statement of Ld counsel for defendant at bar, the application filed by the plaintiff under Order XV-A CPC is hereby dismissed. Complete set of paper book supplied to the defendant from the judicial record. WS be filed by defendant within the statutory period of 90 days from today with advance copy to the other party. Ld counsel for defendant further submits that he will not alienate the suit property till NDOH. In view of the statement of Ld counsel for defendant, the defendant is restrained hereby from non alienating the suit property till NDOH in the present civil suit. Application under Order XXXIX Rule 1& 2 CPC stands disposed off accordingly. Case adjourned to