RITA RIKH vs ARVIND GAUTAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (COMM) 141/2024 RITA RIKH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv. versus ARVIND GAUTAM .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vishal Tewari, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 31.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This appeal, we are constrained to say, is totally unnecessary and has taken up unnecessary judicial time. 2. Having been granted, by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court), Dwarka1, the exact relief sought by her, the appellant has approached this Court, like Oliver Twist, wanting more. 3. The appellant instituted CS (COMM) 472/2023 before the District Judge (Commercial Court), Dwarka alleging infringement, by the respondents, of the appellant’s registered trademark “Dr. Rikh’s Clinic”. The trademark was not registered and the case set up by the 1 “the learned Commercial Court” hereinafter FAO (COMM) 141/2024 4. The appeal was accompanied by an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC, seeking interim injunction against the respondent. The prayer clause in the application reads thus: “It is, therefore, most respectfully and humbly prayed that t