RAVINDER KUMAR LUTHRA vs ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10370/2025, CM APPL. 42997/2025 & CM APPL. 42998/2025 RAVINDER KUMAR LUTHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Anshuman Mehrotra and Mr. Nikunj Arora, Advs. versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sidhant Kumar, Mr. Vishal Chanda and Mr. Om Batra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA O R D E R [ORAL] % 22.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The order under challenge, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 on 9 July 2025, reads thus: “Order of the Tribunal Heard. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and accepts notice. 1 “Tribunal” hereinafter W.P.(C) 10370/2025 2. We have heard Mr. Chhibber, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sidhant Kumar, learned Counsel for the respondents at length. 3. Mr. Chhibber submits that the petitioner is facing dire circumstances and it was for that reason that the petitioner had moved the Tribunal for interim relief. He submits that on earlier occasions his client has been given protection even by this Court. Nonetheless, he submits, the Tribunal has not cond