RAVI PATWARDHAN vs N.K.JAMBHOLKAR & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~1&2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 09.07.2025 (1)+ W.P.(C) 15393/2004 & CM APPL. 11189/2004, CM APPL. 11190/2004 RAVI PATWARDHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajay Pal Singh and Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Advs. versus N.K.JAMBHOLKAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha and Mr. Vishal Agrawal, Advs. for R-4 and 5. (2)+ W.P.(C) 19873/2004 & CM APPL. 14721/2004, CM APPL., 14722/2004 , CM APPL. 14723/2004 , CM APPL. 66229/2023 LAKSHMI NARAYAN NAYAK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Ms Patwardhan, Ms Ishika Jain and Ms. Niyati Patwardhan, Advs. versus N.K.JAMBHOLKAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha and Mr. Vishal Agrawal, Advs. for R-4 and 5. Mr. JPN Shahi and Mr. Divyanshu Kumar, Advs. for R- 6 and 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRIYADARSHANI JAIN W.P.(C) 15393/2004 & 19873/2004 Page 1 of 3 Signing Date:11.07.2025 17:00:54 NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. W.P.(C) 15393/2004 has been filed challenging the Order dated 16.07.2004 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the Tribunal’) in Transfer Application No. 35/2002 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the TA’) as also the Order dated 25.08.2004 in Review Application being R.A. No. 222/2004 filed in the above T.A. 2. W.P.(C) 19873/2004 has been filed challenging the Order dated 16.07.2004 passed by the learned Tribunal in T. A. No. 35/2002 as also the Order dated 16.11.2004 passed in RA No. 223/2004 filed in the above T.A. 3. By the common Impugned Order dated 16.07.2004, the appointment of the petitioners was quashed on the ground that they did not possess the prescribed essential qualifications