Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-10

RAVI KANT JAIN vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. DELHI) AND ANR

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-4499/2025 2025:DHC:5453
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAVI KANT JAIN
Respondent
THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. DELHI) AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 10.07.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C.4499/2025 RAVI KANT JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahesh Tiwari and Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advs. along with the petitioner in person versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with SI Amit Kumar, PS- Badarpur. Mr. Ravi Kant Kaushal, Adv. for R2 along with R2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT (ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 371/2017, dated 24.10.2017, registered at PS Badarpur under sections 354/506/509/34 IPC and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. CRL.M.C. 4499/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:11.07.2025 10:04:15 2. A dispute arose between the parties due to parking of cars wherein Respondent No.2 alleged that the petitioner apart from damaging her car also tried to hit her, abused her and her family and thereafter also threatened the Respondent No.2. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 lodged the aforesaid FIR against Petitioner. The charge sheet was filed under sections 354/506/509/34 IPC. 3. During the proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes. A Certificate of Settlement was drafted by the counsel for the petitioner and signed by the counsel of the Respondent No.2 on her behalf. The copy of Certificate of Settlement dated 15.05.2025 has been placed on record. The Respondent No.2 has tendered her No Objection by an affidavit in this regard. 4. Both parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as

RAVI KANT JAIN vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. DELHI) AND ANR · Niyam