Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-28

RANBIR SARAN DAS vs SANDEEP KUMAR & ANR.

Citation / case number
C.R.P.-71/2025 2025:DHC:6243
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RANBIR SARAN DAS
Respondent
SANDEEP KUMAR & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 28.07.2025 C.R.P. 71/2025 & CM APPL. 13779/2025 RANBIR SARAN DAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohan Gupta and Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocates. versus SANDEEP KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] against the order dated 25.01.2025 passed by learned District Judge- 01, East, Karkardooma Court, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Application under Order I Rule 10(2) of the CPC filed by the Petitioner/Defendant No.2 has been dismissed by the learned Trial Court. 2. The maintainability of this Petition is a subject matter of challenge. It is no longer res integra that the provisions of Section 115 of the CPC cannot be invoked except where an order, if made in favour of the revisionist, would have finally disposed of the suit or proceedings. This is set out in the proviso to Section 115 of the CPC below: “Section 115 – Revision The High Court may call for