Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-07-08

RAJVEER SINGH vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
CRL.L.P.-398/2024 2025:DHC:5414
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAJVEER SINGH
Respondent
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 08.07.2025 + CRL.L.P. 398/2024 RAJVEER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mazali Mohdzulfikar, Adv. Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR SHALINDER KAUR, J (ORAL) CRL.L.P. 398/2024 1. By way of the present criminal leave to appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (CrPC), the petitioner seeks to assail the order dated 08.06.2023 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Special Court, South District, New Delhi in CT. Case No. 13807/2018 titled as “Rajveer Singh vs. Moin Raza Idrisi & Anr.”, whereby the learned Presiding Officer dismissed the complaint in default/non-prosecution. The petitioner further Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.L.P. 398/2024 Page 1 of 6 By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Date:09.07.2025 15:54:03 challenges the order dated 14.10.2023 in CR No. 424/2023 passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Saket Courts, New Delhi, whereby the Revision Petition was dismissed as the same was not maintainable. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there exist substantial and fair chances of the applicant/petitioner succeeding in the accompanying appeal. It is further submitted that the grounds raised in the appeal are prima facie arguable and merit due consideration by this Court. 3. For the reasons stated therein and the grounds raised by the petitioner, the criminal leave to appeal is allowed. CRL.A……/2025(to be numbered) 4. By way of the present appeal the appellant seeks to assail the above said orders and with the consent of parties, arguments heard in appeal. 5. The brief f

RAJVEER SINGH vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. · Niyam